As studiously as I avoid Tom Cruise references, this one is too appropriate to avoid. I am, at last, getting onto the Dark Parker Secret that I’ve been making noise about, and I figure that I’ve over-hyped it just enough to make it really disappointing. Oh, wait, did I say that out loud?
To the point. Last week I got a bit of a gift from an admirer, who shall at request remain anonymous. It was not an extravagant gift by any means, but it plugs up a bit of a hole in my Parker wall; the second pattern of IM. This follows precedent for that model, as the first pattern was a gift from my parents who were faced with the ugly response to “What would you like brought back from Europe?” of “Oh, a fountain pen would be nice, but not too expensive.”
The newer IM struck me immediately as a rather grander object, coming as it did in a more elegant presentation box, and generally giving less impression of being a Vector that’s been dressed up for a big date. However, a moment’s contemplation of this new pen brought a new realization to me. I was being reminded of something else…

One of these things is not like the other... but it's rather hard to tell, isn't it?
The object on the right of this slightly blurry photograph is the newly-arrived IM. The one on the left is that non-fountain pen Ingenuity which I was given for review purposes. There are some subtle differences, but on gross examination, they’re extremely similar. The box for the Ingenuity is rather more posh, with its hinged lid and greater breadth, but the little mattress is the same under each pen is of the same material and thickness.
Once they come out of the boxes, we find that there is even less to tell between these two pens.


Obviously, these are rather different pens when the caps come off. Even without the shenanigans at the front end attracting attention, the Ingenuity is a bigger pen and apt to pull the eye. However, if the kindly observer will allow for the slight variations in light level I seem unable to fully manage, the similarities begin to outweigh the differences. Bright chrome and a smooth black finish on a metal body. Clips that are less likely to upset the fabric of the pocket than you’d think from looking at them. They also feel much the same, at least as far as texture goes, since the Ingenuity is heavier than the IM by far more than the size difference quite accounts for.
And here is my small problem. I want to call out “Fraud!”, because the trim levels are so nearly the same, but one pen costs not less than $100 more than the other. I’ll not go into the enforced replacement of the writing portion of the more expensive one, as that’s aside the point. It seems that Parker is asking people to pay more for a pen mainly on the basis of weight, and my initial reaction is to climb the side of my cage and rattle the bars.
But then I allow my thinking portions to moderate. Let’s look at a couple of other pens:


I offer a couple of other Parkers, contemporary with one another, of which one is slightly smaller than the other and costs an order of magnitude less. Here, the differences are at least manifest in terms of materials. The “51” and the “21” weigh about the same, but one is far more likely to survive a short drop, and one has some gold involved in its making. However, the principle appears to be much the same, and even moreso if one skips ahead a few years to the Super 21.
I now need to try and decide whether I make a big stink about Parker using some dubious practices to shake extra money out of people by means mainly of applying a different name to a not-very-different product, or do I want to revel in the notion that the impecunious can experience much the same joy in writing as the idle rich? I may try to hold both positions at once, as they’re not entirely mutually exclusive, although I suspect I’ll get a cramp.
This is not, by the way, something only Parker has ever gotten up to. The most obvious other example is Sheaffer’s mix’n’match routine with the various members of the TM line, and it’s only the waning of my lunch break than prevents me from offering more. I suppose that it’s why we urge caveat emptor so frequently; the evidence is right there before us, and it’s mainly a question of our own individual vanity and estimation of value. Like the great flappy sleeves of the houppelande, sometimes the reason for buying something is simply to prove that one has the means to do so. For my part, I’ll stick with the more manageable sleeves of a well-cut suit-jacket, and with actual writing performance rather than label.
Today’s pen that proves me something of a hypocrite: Conklin Signature
Today’s ink at a democratic price point: Diamine Emerald Green